HUEL COX JR. BARRED BY FINRA FOR MISAPPROPRIATING CUSTOMER'S FUNDS

Huel Cox Jr., a former broker at Duluth, Georgia based PFS Investments, Inc., submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he consented to, but did not admit to or deny, the described sanction and the entry of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's (FINRA) findings that he misappropriated a customer's funds for his own personal use. According to FINRA's findings, Mr. Cox solicited a friend, who was also a customer of his member firm, to make various investments in real estate and a casino. The customer agreed to make the investments and, over a period of years, wrote personal checks payable to Mr. Cox. FINRA found that Mr. Cox did not make any of the promised real estate investments for the customer. Further, it found Mr. Cox misappropriated at least $206,398.89 of the customer's funds for his own personal use without the customer's authorization. Mr. Cox, of Phoenix, Arizona, was barred from associating with any FINRA member in any capacity.

Broker-dealers must establish and implement a reasonable supervisory system to protect customers from stockbroker fraud and other stockbroker misconduct. If broker-dealers do not establish and implement a reasonable supervisory system, they may be liable to investors for failure to supervise and the damages flowing from the misconduct. Therefore, investors who have suffered damages due to prohibited activity such as misappropriation of funds can bring forth claims to recover losses against broker-dealers like PFS Investments, which should monitor their brokers' activities in order to prevent the above described illegal conduct.

Have you suffered losses in your PFS Investments account due to misappropriation of funds by your broker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against PFS Investments stockbrokers who may have engaged in stockbroker misconduct and caused investment losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 33 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

FINRA SANCTIONS GLOBALINK SECURITIES, INC. AND JUNHUA MICHAEL LIAO FOR FAILURE TO CONDUCT ADEQUATE DUE DILIGENCE OF PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERING

Pasadena, California based GlobaLink Securities, Inc. and Junhua Michael Liao submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which the firm and Mr. Liao consented to, but did not admit to or deny, the described sanctions and the entry of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's (FINRA) findings that the firm, acting through Mr. Liao, executed an agreement to market and sell a Regulation D offering of promissory notes for Medical Capital Holdings Inc. (Med Cap) without performing adequate due diligence. FINRA's findings stated that the firm sold $1,260,049 of the Med Cap notes to some customers, and these sales generated approximately $56,700 in commissions for the firm. The findings also stated that as the firm's chief compliance officer and president throughout the relevant period, Mr. Liao was responsible for ensuring that the firm established, maintained, and enforced a supervisory system and written supervisory procedures (WSPs) reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations.

FINRA included findings that the firm maintained WSPs pertaining to the sales of private placements, but the WSPs were inadequate in that they lacked specifics concerning how the firm would conduct due diligence, process private placement transactions, ensure that a Regulation D product was suitable for investors, and document the firm's decisions and actions regarding private placement transactions. As a result of the firm's deficient supervisory system and WSPs, FINRA found the firm failed to conduct adequate due diligence on the offering. Further, that the failure to conduct due diligence prevented the firm and Mr. Liao from learning that the issuer had experienced payment problems on earlier note offerings and thus, the private placement memorandum (PPM) misrepresented the issuer's past performance. GlobaLink Securities was fined $20,000 jointly and severally with Mr. Liao. Mr. Liao, of San Gabriel, California, was also suspended from association with any FINRA member in any principal capacity for one month - the suspension was in effect from June 3, 2013 through July 2, 2013.

Broker-dealers must establish and implement a reasonable supervisory system and WSPs governing adequate due diligence of investments they intend to market and sell. If broker-dealers do not establish such systems and procedures, they may be liable to investors for damages. Therefore, investors who have suffered damages in the Med Cap private placement can bring forth claims to recover their investment losses from GlobaLink Securities, which should have performed adequate due diligence prior to offering and selling the investment to its customers. Have you suffered losses in your GlobaLink Securities, Inc. account? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 33 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

UBS SECURITIES SUBPOENAED BY MASSACHUSETTS REGULATORS OVER SALES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS TO SENIORS

UBS Securities LLC was subpoenaed by Massachusetts in connection with a sweep investigation, which is looking into sales practices involving alternative investments sold to seniors. UBS Securities' principal office is located in New York, New York. On July 10, 2013, the state's securities division sent the subpoena to UBS Securities asking for information on sales of the products to state residents who are 65 or over. Some of the non-traditional investments include oil and gas partnerships, private placements, structured products, hedge funds, and tenant-in-common offerings. The state demanded information from UBS Securities on any such products that have been sold over the past year, the investors who purchased them, the commissions generated, how the sales were reviewed, and all relevant compliance, training and marketing materials - UBS Securities has until July 24 to respond. The state added that being on the list of targeted firms does not indicate wrongdoing.

Although non-traded REITs were not part of the information request, Massachusetts has expressed its heightened concern "that the senior marketplace is being targeted for the sales of these high-risk, esoteric products," Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin said in a statement. The state has already cracked down on a number of firms for alleged improper sales of non-traded REITs. In February 2013, the state reached a settlement with LPL Financial to pay at least $2 million in restitution and $500,000 in fines related to the sale of non-traded REITs. In May 2013, it settled REIT cases with Ameriprise Financial Services Inc., Commonwealth Financial Network, Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., Royal Alliance Associates Inc. and Securities America Inc. The five firms agreed to pay a total of $6.1 million in restitution to investors and fines totaling $975,000.

Senior investors have become the targets of unscrupulous brokers, investment advisors and insurance agents. This is due in part to the fact that as we age, our ability to understand newer and complex investments diminishes every year. Therefore, senior retirement savings are ripe for picking and an epidemic of fraud is underway all across America. As a result many states, such as Massachusetts, have enacted laws with harsh penalties and are performing investigative sweeps to protect senior investors.

Broker-dealers have a duty to protect senior investors from broker misconduct by establishing and implementing an adequate supervisory system to oversee sales practices. If broker-dealers do not so, they may be liable to senior investors for damages flowing from an unreasonable recommendation and sale. Are you a senior investor suffering losses in your UBS Securities LLC account due to an unreasonable recommendation and sale by your broker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against UBS Securities stockbrokers who may have engaged in misconduct and caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

MEYERS ASSOCIATES LP SUBPOENAED BY MASSACHUSETTS REGULATORS OVER SALES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS TO SENIORS

Meyers Associates LP was subpoenaed by Massachusetts in connection with a sweep investigation, which is looking into sales practices involving alternative investments sold to seniors. Meyers Associates LP's principal office is located in New York, New York. On July 10, 2013, the state's securities division sent the subpoena to Meyers Associates LP asking for information on sales of the products to state residents who are 65 or over. Some of the non-traditional investments include oil and gas partnerships, private placements, structured products, hedge funds, and tenant-in-common offerings. The state demanded information from Meyers Associates LP on any such products that have been sold over the past year, the investors who purchased them, the commissions generated, how the sales were reviewed, and all relevant compliance, training and marketing materials - Meyers Associates LP has until July 24 to respond. The state added that being on the list of targeted firms does not indicate wrongdoing.

Although non-traded REITs were not part of the information request, Massachusetts has expressed its heightened concern "that the senior marketplace is being targeted for the sales of these high-risk, esoteric products," Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin said in a statement. The state has already cracked down on a number of firms for alleged improper sales of non-traded REITs. In February 2013, the state reached a settlement with LPL Financial to pay at least $2 million in restitution and $500,000 in fines related to the sale of non-traded REITs. In May 2013, it settled REIT cases with Ameriprise Financial Services Inc., Commonwealth Financial Network, Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., Royal Alliance Associates Inc. and Securities America Inc. The five firms agreed to pay a total of $6.1 million in restitution to investors and fines totaling $975,000.

Senior investors have become the targets of unscrupulous brokers, investment advisors and insurance agents. This is due in part to the fact that as we age, our ability to understand newer and complex investments diminishes every year. Therefore, senior retirement savings are ripe for picking and an epidemic of fraud is underway all across America. As a result many states, such as Massachusetts, have enacted laws with harsh penalties and are performing investigative sweeps to protect senior investors.

Broker-dealers have a duty to protect senior investors from broker misconduct by establishing and implementing an adequate supervisory system to oversee sales practices. If broker-dealers do not so, they may be liable to senior investors for damages flowing from an unreasonable recommendation and sale. Are you a senior investor suffering losses in your Meyers Associates LP account due to an unreasonable recommendation and sale by your broker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Meyers Associates LP stockbrokers who may have engaged in misconduct and caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

INVESTORS CAPITAL CORP. SUBPOENAED BY MASSACHUSETTS REGULATORS OVER SALES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS TO SENIORS

Investors Capital Corp. was subpoenaed by Massachusetts in connection with a sweep investigation, which is looking into sales practices involving alternative investments sold to seniors. Investors Capital Corp.'s principal office is located in Lynnfield, Massachusetts. On July 10, 2013, the state's securities division sent the subpoena to Investors Capital Corp. asking for information on sales of the products to state residents who are 65 or over. Some of the non-traditional investments include oil and gas partnerships, private placements, structured products, hedge funds, and tenant-in-common offerings. The state demanded information from Investors Capital Corp. on any such products that have been sold over the past year, the investors who purchased them, the commissions generated, how the sales were reviewed, and all relevant compliance, training and marketing materials Investors Capital Corp. has until July 24 to respond. The state added that being on the list of targeted firms does not indicate wrongdoing.

Although non-traded REITs were not part of the information request, Massachusetts has expressed its heightened concern "that the senior marketplace is being targeted for the sales of these high-risk, esoteric products," Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin said in a statement. The state has already cracked down on a number of firms for alleged improper sales of non-traded REITs. In February 2013, the state reached a settlement with LPL Financial to pay at least $2 million in restitution and $500,000 in fines related to the sale of non-traded REITs. In May 2013, it settled REIT cases with Ameriprise Financial Services Inc., Commonwealth Financial Network, Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., Royal Alliance Associates Inc. and Securities America Inc. The five firms agreed to pay a total of $6.1 million in restitution to investors and fines totaling $975,000.

Senior investors have become the targets of unscrupulous brokers, investment advisors and insurance agents. This is due in part to the fact that as we age, our ability to understand newer and complex investments diminishes every year. Therefore, senior retirement savings are ripe for picking and an epidemic of fraud is underway all across America. As a result many states, such as Massachusetts, have enacted laws with harsh penalties and are performing investigative sweeps to protect senior investors.

Broker-dealers have a duty to protect senior investors from broker misconduct by establishing and implementing an adequate supervisory system to oversee sales practices. If broker-dealers do not so, they may be liable to senior investors for damages flowing from an unreasonable recommendation and sale. Are you a senior investor suffering losses in your Investors Capital Corp. account due to an unreasonable recommendation and sale by your broker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Investors Capital Corp. stockbrokers who may have engaged in misconduct and caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

ING FINANCIAL PARTNERS SUBPOENAED BY MASSACHUSETTS REGULATORS OVER SALES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS TO SENIORS

ING Financial Partners, Inc. was subpoenaed by Massachusetts in connection with a sweep investigation, which is looking into sales practices involving alternative investments sold to seniors. ING Financial Partners' principal office is located in Des Moines, Iowa. On July 10, 2013, the state's securities division sent the subpoena to ING Financial Partners asking for information on sales of the products to state residents who are 65 or over. Some of the non-traditional investments include oil and gas partnerships, private placements, structured products, hedge funds, and tenant-in-common offerings. The state demanded information from ING Financial Partners on any such products that have been sold over the past year, the investors who purchased them, the commissions generated, how the sales were reviewed, and all relevant compliance, training and marketing materials - ING Financial Partners has until July 24 to respond. The state added that being on the list of targeted firms does not indicate wrongdoing.

Although non-traded REITs were not part of the information request, Massachusetts has expressed its heightened concern "that the senior marketplace is being targeted for the sales of these high-risk, esoteric products," Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin said in a statement. The state has already cracked down on a number of firms for alleged improper sales of non-traded REITs. In February 2013, the state reached a settlement with LPL Financial to pay at least $2 million in restitution and $500,000 in fines related to the sale of non-traded REITs. In May 2013, it settled REIT cases with Ameriprise Financial Services Inc., Commonwealth Financial Network, Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., Royal Alliance Associates Inc. and Securities America Inc. The five firms agreed to pay a total of $6.1 million in restitution to investors and fines totaling $975,000.

Senior investors have become the targets of unscrupulous brokers, investment advisors and insurance agents. This is due in part to the fact that as we age, our ability to understand newer and complex investments diminishes every year. Therefore, senior retirement savings are ripe for picking and an epidemic of fraud is underway all across America. As a result many states, such as Massachusetts, have enacted laws with harsh penalties and are performing investigative sweeps to protect senior investors.

Broker-dealers have a duty to protect senior investors from broker misconduct by establishing and implementing an adequate supervisory system to oversee sales practices. If broker-dealers do not so, they may be liable to senior investors for damages flowing from an unreasonable recommendation and sale. Are you a senior investor suffering losses in your ING Financial Partners, Inc. account due to an unreasonable recommendation and sale by your broker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against ING Financial Partners stockbrokers who may have engaged in misconduct and caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

WRP INVESTMENTS INVESTOR ALERT - WATCH OUT FOR CHURNING AND UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS!

WRP Investments is an independent broker-dealer headquartered in Youngstown, Ohio and reportedly has over 370 registered representatives across the United States operating in one or two person offices. Its branch offices are largely comprised of small producers earning commissions at higher pay out rates than the major full-service brokerage firms, a recipe for disaster when it comes to protecting investors from churning and unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies!

Churning is a violation of Federal and state securities statutes, industry rules and regulations and a breach of fiduciary duty to investors under common law. Churning can occur if a WRP Investments broker exercises control over the investment decisions in your account and purchases stocks or recommends that you purchase and sell stocks for his benefit, i.e., commissions not yours! These trades rarely, if ever, make the investor any money. In fact, the additional commissions raise the break-even point for the investor to the level where the stock must perform at an extremely high level in order for the investor to make any money.

In every broker-investor relationship, the broker must assess what the investor's goals are as well as his or her risk tolerance. This assessment is based on a number of key factors, including the investor's stated objectives, risk tolerance, financial condition and tax status. It is the broker's responsibility to only pursue investments suitable for that investor based on these factors. A stockbroker is obligated to only recommend suitable investments and investment strategies. If a WRP Investments broker recommends unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies, it can leave you vulnerable to unnecessary risk and losses.

Independent broker-dealers are notorious for their lax supervisory practices and procedures. The business model of these operations is to open many offices nationwide for steady growth of fixed monthly revenues without the costs attendant to a full-service branch office with on-site manager, compliance officer and operation personnel. The registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers generally operate as separately incorporated businesses. They are not employees of the broker-dealer and therefore not controlled in the same manner as full-service brokerage firm representatives. The registered representatives control their structure and costs to maximize profits and often leave the protection of investors' rights and interests as their lowest priority.

The typical supervisory organization of independent broker-dealer operations is to have other independent contractors operate Offices of Supervisory Jurisdiction (OSJs) to monitor the registered representatives from geographically remote offices and then report to the main franchisor's compliance office at national headquarters. The supervisors at the OSJs are not employees of the franchisor and often run their own brokerage, insurance and other businesses. They are not devoted full-time supervisors of the smaller branch offices. Consequently, OSJ managers cannot and do not supervise the day-to-day operations of the registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers.

There is no immediate review of new accounts opened, securities transactions, business records, cash or securities receipts and deliveries, correspondence and business activities unrelated to the securities brokerage operation at these independent brokerage firms. The lax supervision leaves investors who have transferred their accounts to the smaller independent broker-dealer vulnerable to excessive purchases and sales of securities and securities that have not been reviewed or authorized by anyone other than the sales representative earning a commission. Generally, no manager is onsite to detect the placement of inaccurate information about a client's investment objectives and financial condition to document the suitability of a particular investment recommendation. There is no daily review of sales literature and client correspondence to protect against misrepresentations and misleading statements being made to investors. In fact, there may be only one compliance audit visit per year at many of these offices. These independent brokerage business operations are worrisome to the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), which has documented more instances of sales abuse and consequently investor losses at these firms.

Have you suffered losses in your WRP Investments brokerage account? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against WRP Investments stockbrokers who engaged in churning, recommended unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies that caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES SUBPOENAED BY MASSACHUSETTS REGULATORS OVER SALES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS TO SENIORS

Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC was subpoenaed by Massachusetts in connection with a sweep investigation, which is looking into sales practices involving alternative investments sold to seniors. Fidelity Brokerage Services' principal office is located in Smithfield, Rhode Island. On July 10, 2013, the state's securities division sent the subpoena to Fidelity Brokerage Services asking for information on sales of the products to state residents who are 65 or over. Some of the non-traditional investments include oil and gas partnerships, private placements, structured products, hedge funds, and tenant-in-common offerings. The state demanded information from Fidelity Brokerage Services on any such products that have been sold over the past year, the investors who purchased them, the commissions generated, how the sales were reviewed, and all relevant compliance, training and marketing materials - Fidelity Brokerage Services has until July 24 to respond. The state added that being on the list of targeted firms does not indicate wrongdoing.

Although non-traded REITs were not part of the information request, Massachusetts has expressed its heightened concern "that the senior marketplace is being targeted for the sales of these high-risk, esoteric products," Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin said in a statement. The state has already cracked down on a number of firms for alleged improper sales of non-traded REITs. In February 2013, the state reached a settlement with LPL Financial to pay at least $2 million in restitution and $500,000 in fines related to the sale of non-traded REITs. In May 2013, it settled REIT cases with Ameriprise Financial Services Inc., Commonwealth Financial Network, Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., Royal Alliance Associates Inc. and Securities America Inc. The five firms agreed to pay a total of $6.1 million in restitution to investors and fines totaling $975,000.

Senior investors have become the targets of unscrupulous brokers, investment advisors and insurance agents. This is due in part to the fact that as we age, our ability to understand newer and complex investments diminishes every year. Therefore, senior retirement savings are ripe for picking and an epidemic of fraud is underway all across America. As a result many states, such as Massachusetts, have enacted laws with harsh penalties and are performing investigative sweeps to protect senior investors.

Broker-dealers have a duty to protect senior investors from broker misconduct by establishing and implementing an adequate supervisory system to oversee sales practices. If broker-dealers do not so, they may be liable to senior investors for damages flowing from an unreasonable recommendation and sale. Are you a senior investor suffering losses in your Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC account due to an unreasonable recommendation and sale by your broker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Fidelity Brokerage Services stockbrokers who may have engaged in misconduct and caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

HKC SECURITIES, INC. N.K.A. ACGM, INC. AND HAROLD KENNETH COHEN FINED AND SUSPENDED BY FINRA FOR VIOLATING INDUSTRY RULES

New York, New York based HKC Securities, Inc., now known as ACGM, Inc., and Harold Kenneth Cohen, of Palm Beach, Florida, submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which the firm and Mr. Cohen consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's (FINRA) findings that the firm's hedge fund sales material failed to fairly present the risks and potential disadvantages of hedge fund investing, highlighting only the fund's positive features and not providing a sound basis for evaluating the investment, included exaggerated language, failed to identify the basis for factual statements made, and contained an inadequate discussion of the performance of the funds.

FINRA's findings stated that while the firm was engaged in marketing hedge funds, the firm's written supervisory procedures (WSPs) provided insufficient guidance with respect to FINRA's content standards for hedge fund advertising and did not discuss required risk disclosures specific to hedge fund investing. Mr. Cohen, as the firm's chief compliance officer (CCO), was responsible for the establishment of such procedures. The findings also stated that the firm failed to adequately supervise its registered representatives' use of institutional sales material. Mr. Cohen was the supervisor responsible for reviewing and approving communications with the public but did not follow the firm's written procedures, which required post-hoc review of institutional sales material and a written notation of approval. Mr. Cohen's review was limited, in that his review was not focused on compliance with FINRA's content standards, such as whether the documents contained exaggerated statements, had sufficient risk disclosures, or identified the factual basis for the statements made. Mr. Cohen's review was also limited to the summary document the firm prepared, and did not extend to the materials the firm sent that the funds themselves had prepared.

FINRA's findings also included that the firm did not maintain a complete file of institutional sales material used and did not notate the sales material with the name of the person who prepared the document and the date that the document was first circulated. Mr. Cohen was responsible for ensuring the firm's compliance with these recordkeeping requirements. The firm was censured and fined $50,000, and Cohen was censured and fined $10,000.

Broker-dealers must establish and implement a reasonable supervisory system to protect customers from broker misconduct. If broker-dealers do not establish and implement a reasonable supervisory system, they may be liable to investors for damages flowing from the misconduct. Therefore, investors who have suffered damages due to their reliance on insufficient and/or misleading sales materials can bring forth claims to recover losses against broker-dealers like HKC Securities, Inc. or ACGM, Inc., which should have adequately informed its investors of the risks and performance of the subject hedge funds.

Have you suffered losses in your HKC Securities, Inc. or ACGM, Inc. account due to misrepresented hedge funds? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against HKC Securities, Inc. or ACGM, Inc. stockbrokers who may have engaged in misconduct and caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

CHARLES SCHWAB & CO. SUBPOENAED BY MASSACHUSETTS REGULATORS OVER SALES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS TO SENIORS

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. was subpoenaed by Massachusetts in connection with a sweep investigation, which is looking into sales practices involving alternative investments sold to seniors. Charles Schwab & Co.'s principal office is located in San Francisco, California. On July 10, 2013, the state's securities division sent the subpoena to Charles Schwab asking for information on sales of the products to state residents who are 65 or over. Some of the non-traditional investments include oil and gas partnerships, private placements, structured products, hedge funds, and tenant-in-common offerings. The state demanded information from Charles Schwab on any such products that have been sold over the past year, the investors who purchased them, the commissions generated, how the sales were reviewed, and all relevant compliance, training and marketing materials - Charles Schwab has until July 24 to respond. The state added that being on the list of targeted firms does not indicate wrongdoing.

Although non-traded REITs were not part of the information request, Massachusetts has expressed its heightened concern "that the senior marketplace is being targeted for the sales of these high-risk, esoteric products," Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin said in a statement. The state has already cracked down on a number of firms for alleged improper sales of non-traded REITs. In February 2013, the state reached a settlement with LPL Financial to pay at least $2 million in restitution and $500,000 in fines related to the sale of non-traded REITs. In May 2013, it settled REIT cases with Ameriprise Financial Services Inc., Commonwealth Financial Network, Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., Royal Alliance Associates Inc. and Securities America Inc. The five firms agreed to pay a total of $6.1 million in restitution to investors and fines totaling $975,000.

Senior investors have become the targets of unscrupulous brokers, investment advisors and insurance agents. This is due in part to the fact that as we age, our ability to understand newer and complex investments diminishes every year. Therefore, senior retirement savings are ripe for picking and an epidemic of fraud is underway all across America. As a result many states, such as Massachusetts, have enacted laws with harsh penalties and are performing investigative sweeps to protect senior investors.

Broker-dealers have a duty to protect senior investors from broker misconduct by establishing and implementing an adequate supervisory system to oversee sales practices. If broker-dealers do not so, they may be liable to senior investors for damages flowing from an unreasonable recommendation and sale. Are you a senior investor suffering losses in your Charles Schwab account due to an unreasonable recommendation and sale by your broker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Charles Schwab stockbrokers who may have engaged in misconduct and caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

LPL FINANCIAL SUBPOENAED BY MASSACHUSETTS REGULATORS OVER SALES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS TO SENIORS

LPL Financial LLC was subpoenaed by Massachusetts in connection with a sweep investigation, which is looking into sales practices involving alternative investments sold to seniors. LPL Financial's principal office is located in Boston, Massachusetts. On July 10, 2013, the state's securities division sent the subpoena to LPL Financial asking for information on sales of the products to state residents who are 65 or over. Some of the non-traditional investments include oil and gas partnerships, private placements, structured products, hedge funds, and tenant-in-common offerings. The state demanded information from LPL Financial on any such products that have been sold over the past year, the investors who purchased them, the commissions generated, how the sales were reviewed, and all relevant compliance, training and marketing materials - LPL Financial has until July 24 to respond. The state added that being on the list of targeted firms does not indicate wrongdoing.

Although non-traded REITs were not part of the information request, Massachusetts has expressed its heightened concern "that the senior marketplace is being targeted for the sales of these high-risk, esoteric products," Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin said in a statement. The state has already cracked down on a number of firms for alleged improper sales of non-traded REITs. In February 2013, the state reached a settlement with LPL Financial to pay at least $2 million in restitution and $500,000 in fines related to the sale of non-traded REITs. In May 2013, it settled REIT cases with Ameriprise Financial Services Inc., Commonwealth Financial Network, Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp., Royal Alliance Associates Inc. and Securities America Inc. The five firms agreed to pay a total of $6.1 million in restitution to investors and fines totaling $975,000.

Senior investors have become the targets of unscrupulous brokers, investment advisors and insurance agents. This is due in part to the fact that as we age, our ability to understand newer and complex investments diminishes every year. Therefore, senior retirement savings are ripe for picking and an epidemic of fraud is underway all across America. As a result many states, such as Massachusetts, have enacted laws with harsh penalties and are performing investigative sweeps to protect senior investors.

Broker-dealers have a duty to protect senior investors from broker misconduct by establishing and implementing an adequate supervisory system to oversee sales practices. If broker-dealers do not so, they may be liable to senior investors for damages flowing from an unreasonable recommendation and sale. Are you a senior investor suffering losses in your LPL Financial LLC account due to an unreasonable recommendation and sale by your broker? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against LPL Financial stockbrokers who may have engaged in misconduct and caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

WALL STREET FINANCIAL INVESTOR ALERT - WATCH OUT FOR CHURNING AND UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS!

Wall Street Financial is an independent broker-dealer headquartered in Fairport, New York and reportedly has over 170 registered representatives across the United States operating in one or two person offices. Its branch offices are largely comprised of small producers earning commissions at higher pay out rates than the major full-service brokerage firms, a recipe for disaster when it comes to protecting investors from churning and unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies!

Churning is a violation of Federal and state securities statutes, industry rules and regulations and a breach of fiduciary duty to investors under common law. Churning can occur if a Wall Street Financial broker exercises control over the investment decisions in your account and purchases stocks or recommends that you purchase and sell stocks for his benefit, i.e., commissions not yours! These trades rarely, if ever, make the investor any money. In fact, the additional commissions raise the break-even point for the investor to the level where the stock must perform at an extremely high level in order for the investor to make any money.

In every broker-investor relationship, the broker must assess what the investor's goals are as well as his or her risk tolerance. This assessment is based on a number of key factors, including the investor's stated objectives, risk tolerance, financial condition and tax status. It is the broker's responsibility to only pursue investments suitable for that investor based on these factors. A stockbroker is obligated to only recommend suitable investments and investment strategies. If a Wall Street Financial broker recommends unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies, it can leave you vulnerable to unnecessary risk and losses.

Independent broker-dealers are notorious for their lax supervisory practices and procedures. The business model of these operations is to open many offices nationwide for steady growth of fixed monthly revenues without the costs attendant to a full-service branch office with on-site manager, compliance officer and operation personnel. The registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers generally operate as separately incorporated businesses. They are not employees of the broker-dealer and therefore not controlled in the same manner as full-service brokerage firm representatives. The registered representatives control their structure and costs to maximize profits and often leave the protection of investors' rights and interests as their lowest priority.

The typical supervisory organization of independent broker-dealer operations is to have other independent contractors operate Offices of Supervisory Jurisdiction (OSJs) to monitor the registered representatives from geographically remote offices and then report to the main franchisor's compliance office at national headquarters. The supervisors at the OSJs are not employees of the franchisor and often run their own brokerage, insurance and other businesses. They are not devoted full-time supervisors of the smaller branch offices. Consequently, OSJ managers cannot and do not supervise the day-to-day operations of the registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers.

There is no immediate review of new accounts opened, securities transactions, business records, cash or securities receipts and deliveries, correspondence and business activities unrelated to the securities brokerage operation at these independent brokerage firms. The lax supervision leaves investors who have transferred their accounts to the smaller independent broker-dealer vulnerable to excessive purchases and sales of securities and securities that have not been reviewed or authorized by anyone other than the sales representative earning a commission. Generally, no manager is onsite to detect the placement of inaccurate information about a client's investment objectives and financial condition to document the suitability of a particular investment recommendation. There is no daily review of sales literature and client correspondence to protect against misrepresentations and misleading statements being made to investors. In fact, there may be only one compliance audit visit per year at many of these offices. These independent brokerage business operations are worrisome to the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), which has documented more instances of sales abuse and consequently investor losses at these firms.

Have you suffered losses in your Wall Street Financial brokerage account? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Wall Street Financial stockbrokers who engaged in churning, recommended unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies that caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

PARK AVENUE SECURITIES INVESTOR ALERT - WATCH OUT FOR CHURNING AND UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS!

Park Avenue Securities, a subsidiary of the Guardian Life Insurance Company, is an independent broker-dealer headquartered in New York City and reportedly has over 2300 registered representatives across the United States operating in one or two person offices. Its branch offices are largely comprised of small producers earning commissions at higher pay out rates than the major full-service brokerage firms, a recipe for disaster when it comes to protecting investors from churning and unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies!

Churning is a violation of Federal and state securities statutes, industry rules and regulations and a breach of fiduciary duty to investors under common law. Churning can occur if a Park Avenue Securities broker exercises control over the investment decisions in your account and purchases stocks or recommends that you purchase and sell stocks for his benefit, i.e., commissions not yours! These trades rarely, if ever, make the investor any money. In fact, the additional commissions raise the break-even point for the investor to the level where the stock must perform at an extremely high level in order for the investor to make any money.

In every broker-investor relationship, the broker must assess what the investor's goals are as well as his or her risk tolerance. This assessment is based on a number of key factors, including the investor's stated objectives, risk tolerance, financial condition and tax status. It is the broker's responsibility to only pursue investments suitable for that investor based on these factors. A stockbroker is obligated to only recommend suitable investments and investment strategies. If a Park Avenue Securities broker recommends unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies, it can leave you vulnerable to unnecessary risk and losses.

Independent broker-dealers are notorious for their lax supervisory practices and procedures. The business model of these operations is to open many offices nationwide for steady growth of fixed monthly revenues without the costs attendant to a full-service branch office with on-site manager, compliance officer and operation personnel. The registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers generally operate as separately incorporated businesses. They are not employees of the broker-dealer and therefore not controlled in the same manner as full-service brokerage firm representatives. The registered representatives control their structure and costs to maximize profits and often leave the protection of investors' rights and interests as their lowest priority.

The typical supervisory organization of independent broker-dealer operations is to have other independent contractors operate Offices of Supervisory Jurisdiction (OSJs) to monitor the registered representatives from geographically remote offices and then report to the main franchisor's compliance office at national headquarters. The supervisors at the OSJs are not employees of the franchisor and often run their own brokerage, insurance and other businesses. They are not devoted full-time supervisors of the smaller branch offices. Consequently, OSJ managers cannot and do not supervise the day-to-day operations of the registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers.

There is no immediate review of new accounts opened, securities transactions, business records, cash or securities receipts and deliveries, correspondence and business activities unrelated to the securities brokerage operation at these independent brokerage firms. The lax supervision leaves investors who have transferred their accounts to the smaller independent broker-dealer vulnerable to excessive purchases and sales of securities and securities that have not been reviewed or authorized by anyone other than the sales representative earning a commission. Generally, no manager is onsite to detect the placement of inaccurate information about a client's investment objectives and financial condition to document the suitability of a particular investment recommendation. There is no daily review of sales literature and client correspondence to protect against misrepresentations and misleading statements being made to investors. In fact, there may be only one compliance audit visit per year at many of these offices. These independent brokerage business operations are worrisome to the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), which has documented more instances of sales abuse and consequently investor losses at these firms.

Have you suffered losses in your Park Avenue Securities brokerage account? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Park Avenue Securities stockbrokers who engaged in churning, recommended unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies that caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

LIFEMARK SECURITIES INVESTOR ALERT - WATCH OUT FOR CHURNING AND UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS!

LifeMark Securities is an independent broker-dealer headquartered in Rochester, New York and reportedly has over 100 registered representatives across the United States operating in one or two person offices. Its branch offices are largely comprised of small producers earning commissions at higher pay out rates than the major full-service brokerage firms, a recipe for disaster when it comes to protecting investors from churning and unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies!

Churning is a violation of Federal and state securities statutes, industry rules and regulations and a breach of fiduciary duty to investors under common law. Churning can occur if a LifeMark Securities broker exercises control over the investment decisions in your account and purchases stocks or recommends that you purchase and sell stocks for his benefit, i.e., commissions not yours! These trades rarely, if ever, make the investor any money. In fact, the additional commissions raise the break-even point for the investor to the level where the stock must perform at an extremely high level in order for the investor to make any money.

In every broker-investor relationship, the broker must assess what the investor's goals are as well as his or her risk tolerance. This assessment is based on a number of key factors, including the investor's stated objectives, risk tolerance, financial condition and tax status. It is the broker's responsibility to only pursue investments suitable for that investor based on these factors. A stockbroker is obligated to only recommend suitable investments and investment strategies. If a LifeMark Securities broker recommends unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies, it can leave you vulnerable to unnecessary risk and losses.

Independent broker-dealers are notorious for their lax supervisory practices and procedures. The business model of these operations is to open many offices nationwide for steady growth of fixed monthly revenues without the costs attendant to a full-service branch office with on-site manager, compliance officer and operation personnel. The registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers generally operate as separately incorporated businesses. They are not employees of the broker-dealer and therefore not controlled in the same manner as full-service brokerage firm representatives. The registered representatives control their structure and costs to maximize profits and often leave the protection of investors' rights and interests as their lowest priority.

The typical supervisory organization of independent broker-dealer operations is to have other independent contractors operate Offices of Supervisory Jurisdiction (OSJs) to monitor the registered representatives from geographically remote offices and then report to the main franchisor's compliance office at national headquarters. The supervisors at the OSJs are not employees of the franchisor and often run their own brokerage, insurance and other businesses. They are not devoted full-time supervisors of the smaller branch offices. Consequently, OSJ managers cannot and do not supervise the day-to-day operations of the registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers.

There is no immediate review of new accounts opened, securities transactions, business records, cash or securities receipts and deliveries, correspondence and business activities unrelated to the securities brokerage operation at these independent brokerage firms. The lax supervision leaves investors who have transferred their accounts to the smaller independent broker-dealer vulnerable to excessive purchases and sales of securities and securities that have not been reviewed or authorized by anyone other than the sales representative earning a commission. Generally, no manager is onsite to detect the placement of inaccurate information about a client's investment objectives and financial condition to document the suitability of a particular investment recommendation. There is no daily review of sales literature and client correspondence to protect against misrepresentations and misleading statements being made to investors. In fact, there may be only one compliance audit visit per year at many of these offices. These independent brokerage business operations are worrisome to the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), which has documented more instances of sales abuse and consequently investor losses at these firms.

Have you suffered losses in your LifeMark Securities brokerage account? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against LifeMark Securities stockbrokers who engaged in churning, recommended unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies that caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

EQUITY SERVICES INVESTOR ALERT - WATCH OUT FOR CHURNING AND UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS!

Equity Services, Inc., a subsidiary of the National Life Group, is an independent broker-dealer headquartered in Montpelier, Vermont and reportedly has over 500 registered representatives across the United States operating in one or two person offices. Its branch offices are largely comprised of small producers earning commissions at higher pay out rates than the major full-service brokerage firms, a recipe for disaster when it comes to protecting investors from churning and unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies!

Churning is a violation of Federal and state securities statutes, industry rules and regulations and a breach of fiduciary duty to investors under common law. Churning can occur if an Equity Services broker exercises control over the investment decisions in your account and purchases stocks or recommends that you purchase and sell stocks for his benefit, i.e., commissions not yours! These trades rarely, if ever, make the investor any money. In fact, the additional commissions raise the break-even point for the investor to the level where the stock must perform at an extremely high level in order for the investor to make any money.

In every broker-investor relationship, the broker must assess what the investor's goals are as well as his or her risk tolerance. This assessment is based on a number of key factors, including the investor's stated objectives, risk tolerance, financial condition and tax status. It is the broker's responsibility to only pursue investments suitable for that investor based on these factors. A stockbroker is obligated to only recommend suitable investments and investment strategies. If an Equity Services broker recommends unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies, it can leave you vulnerable to unnecessary risk and losses.

Independent broker-dealers are notorious for their lax supervisory practices and procedures. The business model of these operations is to open many offices nationwide for steady growth of fixed monthly revenues without the costs attendant to a full-service branch office with on-site manager, compliance officer and operation personnel. The registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers generally operate as separately incorporated businesses. They are not employees of the broker-dealer and therefore not controlled in the same manner as full-service brokerage firm representatives. The registered representatives control their structure and costs to maximize profits and often leave the protection of investors' rights and interests as their lowest priority.

The typical supervisory organization of independent broker-dealer operations is to have other independent contractors operate Offices of Supervisory Jurisdiction (OSJs) to monitor the registered representatives from geographically remote offices and then report to the main franchisor's compliance office at national headquarters. The supervisors at the OSJs are not employees of the franchisor and often run their own brokerage, insurance and other businesses. They are not devoted full-time supervisors of the smaller branch offices. Consequently, OSJ managers cannot and do not supervise the day-to-day operations of the registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers.

There is no immediate review of new accounts opened, securities transactions, business records, cash or securities receipts and deliveries, correspondence and business activities unrelated to the securities brokerage operation at these independent brokerage firms. The lax supervision leaves investors who have transferred their accounts to the smaller independent broker-dealer vulnerable to excessive purchases and sales of securities and securities that have not been reviewed or authorized by anyone other than the sales representative earning a commission. Generally, no manager is onsite to detect the placement of inaccurate information about a client's investment objectives and financial condition to document the suitability of a particular investment recommendation. There is no daily review of sales literature and client correspondence to protect against misrepresentations and misleading statements being made to investors. In fact, there may be only one compliance audit visit per year at many of these offices. These independent brokerage business operations are worrisome to the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), which has documented more instances of sales abuse and consequently investor losses at these firms.

Have you suffered losses in your Equity Services brokerage account? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Equity Services stockbrokers who engaged in churning, recommended unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies that caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

CFD INVESTMENTS INVESTOR ALERT - WATCH OUT FOR CHURNING AND UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS!

CFD Investments Inc. is an independent broker-dealer headquartered in Kokomo, Indiana and reportedly has over 200 registered representatives across the United States operating in one or two person offices. Its branch offices are largely comprised of small producers earning commissions at higher pay out rates than the major full-service brokerage firms, a recipe for disaster when it comes to protecting investors from churning and unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies!

Churning is a violation of Federal and state securities statutes, industry rules and regulations and a breach of fiduciary duty to investors under common law. Churning can occur if a CFD Investments broker exercises control over the investment decisions in your account and purchases stocks or recommends that you purchase and sell stocks for his benefit, i.e., commissions not yours! These trades rarely, if ever, make the investor any money. In fact, the additional commissions raise the break-even point for the investor to the level where the stock must perform at an extremely high level in order for the investor to make any money.

In every broker-investor relationship, the broker must assess what the investor's goals are as well as his or her risk tolerance. This assessment is based on a number of key factors, including the investor's stated objectives, risk tolerance, financial condition and tax status. It is the broker's responsibility to only pursue investments suitable for that investor based on these factors. A stockbroker is obligated to only recommend suitable investments and investment strategies. If a CFD Investments broker recommends unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies, it can leave you vulnerable to unnecessary risk and losses.

Independent broker-dealers are notorious for their lax supervisory practices and procedures. The business model of these operations is to open many offices nationwide for steady growth of fixed monthly revenues without the costs attendant to a full-service branch office with on-site manager, compliance officer and operation personnel. The registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers generally operate as separately incorporated businesses. They are not employees of the broker-dealer and therefore not controlled in the same manner as full-service brokerage firm representatives. The registered representatives control their structure and costs to maximize profits and often leave the protection of investors' rights and interests as their lowest priority.

The typical supervisory organization of independent broker-dealer operations is to have other independent contractors operate Offices of Supervisory Jurisdiction (OSJs) to monitor the registered representatives from geographically remote offices and then report to the main franchisor's compliance office at national headquarters. The supervisors at the OSJs are not employees of the franchisor and often run their own brokerage, insurance and other businesses. They are not devoted full-time supervisors of the smaller branch offices. Consequently, OSJ managers cannot and do not supervise the day-to-day operations of the registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers.

There is no immediate review of new accounts opened, securities transactions, business records, cash or securities receipts and deliveries, correspondence and business activities unrelated to the securities brokerage operation at these independent brokerage firms. The lax supervision leaves investors who have transferred their accounts to the smaller independent broker-dealer vulnerable to excessive purchases and sales of securities and securities that have not been reviewed or authorized by anyone other than the sales representative earning a commission. Generally, no manager is onsite to detect the placement of inaccurate information about a client's investment objectives and financial condition to document the suitability of a particular investment recommendation. There is no daily review of sales literature and client correspondence to protect against misrepresentations and misleading statements being made to investors. In fact, there may be only one compliance audit visit per year at many of these offices. These independent brokerage business operations are worrisome to the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), which has documented more instances of sales abuse and consequently investor losses at these firms.

Have you suffered losses in your CFD Investments brokerage account? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against CFD Investments stockbrokers who engaged in churning, recommended unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies that caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

CETERA FINANCIAL INVESTOR ALERT - WATCH OUT FOR CHURNING AND UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS!

Cetera Financial Specialists, a subsidiary of the Cetera Financial Group, is an independent broker-dealer headquartered in Schaumburg, Illinois and reportedly has over 2000 registered representatives across the United States operating in one or two person offices. Its branch offices are largely comprised of small producers earning commissions at higher pay out rates than the major full-service brokerage firms, a recipe for disaster when it comes to protecting investors from churning and unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies!

Churning is a violation of Federal and state securities statutes, industry rules and regulations and a breach of fiduciary duty to investors under common law. Churning can occur if a Cetera Financial broker exercises control over the investment decisions in your account and purchases stocks or recommends that you purchase and sell stocks for his benefit, i.e., commissions not yours! These trades rarely, if ever, make the investor any money. In fact, the additional commissions raise the break-even point for the investor to the level where the stock must perform at an extremely high level in order for the investor to make any money.

In every broker-investor relationship, the broker must assess what the investor's goals are as well as his or her risk tolerance. This assessment is based on a number of key factors, including the investor's stated objectives, risk tolerance, financial condition and tax status. It is the broker's responsibility to only pursue investments suitable for that investor based on these factors. A stockbroker is obligated to only recommend suitable investments and investment strategies. If a Cetera Financial broker recommends unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies, it can leave you vulnerable to unnecessary risk and losses.

Independent broker-dealers are notorious for their lax supervisory practices and procedures. The business model of these operations is to open many offices nationwide for steady growth of fixed monthly revenues without the costs attendant to a full-service branch office with on-site manager, compliance officer and operation personnel. The registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers generally operate as separately incorporated businesses. They are not employees of the broker-dealer and therefore not controlled in the same manner as full-service brokerage firm representatives. The registered representatives control their structure and costs to maximize profits and often leave the protection of investors' rights and interests as their lowest priority.

The typical supervisory organization of independent broker-dealer operations is to have other independent contractors operate Offices of Supervisory Jurisdiction (OSJs) to monitor the registered representatives from geographically remote offices and then report to the main franchisor's compliance office at national headquarters. The supervisors at the OSJs are not employees of the franchisor and often run their own brokerage, insurance and other businesses. They are not devoted full-time supervisors of the smaller branch offices. Consequently, OSJ managers cannot and do not supervise the day-to-day operations of the registered representatives of these independent broker-dealers.

There is no immediate review of new accounts opened, securities transactions, business records, cash or securities receipts and deliveries, correspondence and business activities unrelated to the securities brokerage operation at these independent brokerage firms. The lax supervision leaves investors who have transferred their accounts to the smaller independent broker-dealer vulnerable to excessive purchases and sales of securities and securities that have not been reviewed or authorized by anyone other than the sales representative earning a commission. Generally, no manager is onsite to detect the placement of inaccurate information about a client's investment objectives and financial condition to document the suitability of a particular investment recommendation. There is no daily review of sales literature and client correspondence to protect against misrepresentations and misleading statements being made to investors. In fact, there may be only one compliance audit visit per year at many of these offices. These independent brokerage business operations are worrisome to the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), which has documented more instances of sales abuse and consequently investor losses at these firms.

Have you suffered losses in your Cetera Financial brokerage account? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Cetera Financial stockbrokers who engaged in churning, recommended unsuitable investments and unsuitable investment strategies that caused investors losses.

The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

JAMES MARTIN HIGGS FINED AND SUSPENDED BY FINRA FOR SELLING AWAY EQUITY-INDEXED ANNUITIES

James Martin Higgs, formerly with Newark, New Jersey based Pruco Securities, LLC, submitted a letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent in which he consented to sanctions and to the entry of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) findings that after his member firm placed him on probation for selling equity-indexed annuities (EIAs) to customers outside of its sponsored programs, Mr. Higgs continued to sell EIAs to individuals outside the scope of his employment. FINRA stated that some of the individuals who purchased EIAs were the firm's customers, but Mr. Higgs did not provide his firm with prior written notice of the business activity. Mr. Higgs, of Parkersburg, West Virginia, was fined $10,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for seven months. The fine must be paid either upon Higgs' re-association with a FINRA member firm following his suspension, or prior to the filing of any application or request for relief from any statutory disqualification, whichever is earlier.
Selling away is the inappropriate practice of an investment professional who sells or solicits securities or investments not held or approved by the brokerage firm with which the professional is associated with. Under NASD and FINRA rules, brokerage firms must approve investments offered by their investment professionals and supervise its sales.
Equity-indexed annuities are complex products that are hybrid of both fixed and variable annuities. Their returns vary more than a fixed annuity, but not as much as a variable annuity. So, equity-indexed annuities are more risky than fixed annuities, but less risky than a variable annuity. Equity-indexed annuities offer a minimum guaranteed interest rate combined with an interest rate linked to a market index. Because of the guaranteed interest rate, equity-indexed annuities have less market risk than variable annuities. Equity-indexed annuities also have the potential to earn returns better than traditional fixed annuities when the stock market is rising. Equity-indexed annuities come with fees that are higher than any investment, and sales commissions to brokers can go as high as 12%. Surrender charges can go as high as 18%.
Mr. Higgs' undisclosed EIA sales totaled approximately $674,804.61, and he received approximately $22,838.50 as compensation for the transactions. Investors who may have suffered damages caused by the EIAs they purchased should know that Pruco Securities can be held liable for Mr. Higgs' selling away activities because it either failed to establish a reasonable supervisory system, or because it failed to implement an existing reasonable supervisory system. Even if Pruco Securities did not know of Mr. Higgs' activities, it can still be liable to investors for damages.
Have you suffered losses in your Pruco Securities, LLC brokerage account? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against Pruco Securities, LLC stockbrokers who may have engaged in misconduct and caused investors losses.
The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.

STATE FARM VP MANAGEMENT CORP. CENSURED AND FINED FOR VARIOUS SECURITIES LAWS VIOLATIONS

State Farm VP Management Corp., a Bloomington, Illinois based brokerage firm, submitted a letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent after the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) entered findings that the firm failed to establish, maintain, and enforce a supervisory system or written supervisory procedures (WSPs) reasonably designed to ensure timely delivery of mutual fund prospectuses, when it was required to provide all customers who purchased a mutual fund a prospectus for that fund no later than three business days after the transaction. FINRA's findings stated that the firm executed numerous mutual fund purchase transactions that required it to deliver a mutual fund prospectus to the purchasing customer, and as such, establish and maintain a supervisory system and WSPs reasonably designed to oversee and ensure the timely delivery of mutual fund prospectuses. FINRA also stated that the firm failed to establish, maintain, and enforce an adequate supervisory system or written procedures to supervise mutual fund prospectus delivery, when it had inadequate systems and procedures in place to monitor and ensure compliance with its WSPs directive concerning delivery of a current mutual fund prospectus by its brokers to each client prior to or at the time of the sales presentation in which the broker recommended or discussed a specific mutual fund. The firm was censured and fined a total $155,000 for all violations.
A prospectus is a document that discloses important information about an investment. It typically provides investors with material information about mutual funds, stocks, bonds, and other investments. Such information generally includes a description of the company's business, financial statements, biographies of officers and directors, detailed information about their compensation, any litigation that is taking place, a list of material properties, and any other material information.
In addition, FINRA stated that the firm also had inadequate systems and procedures in place to monitor the performance of its third-party service provider in order to ensure that mutual fund prospectuses were being delivered timely. The findings also included that the firm failed to enforce its procedures requiring delivery of undated mutual fund prospectuses to certain fund holders. The firm's procedures required delivery of mutual fund prospectuses following fund companies' annual updates to their prospectuses. However, during a period, the firm failed to deliver prospectuses to certain mutual fund holders following the annual updates of the funds' prospectuses. During that period, the firm's customers were given an option to opt out of house-holding when completing paper applications. The firm did not adequately monitor its third-party vendor to ensure the mailing list was complete, and as a result, the firm failed to deliver updated prospectuses to certain fund holders as its procedures required.
Moreover, FINRA found that the firm failed to implement a supervisory system and procedures that were reasonably designed to review, monitor, and store email brokers sent to customers. The firm allowed brokers to use an email program for pre-approved email communications with customers and used a third party service provider for email archival. For supervisory purposes, all brokers were required to copy all securities-related messages into a designated mailbox. The firm's compliance department was responsible for reviewing the emails in that box. The firm did not retain securities related emails not copied to this mailbox, but established procedures to verify whether brokers were complying with these directives. The firm was aware that not all of its brokers were complying with firm procedures. Because of the reviews, the firm discovered numerous incidents of noncompliance with firm guidelines regarding selected brokers' use of the mailbox. Although the firm made this discovery, it failed to conduct deeper reviews or modify its procedures.
Have you suffered losses in your State Farm VP Management Corp. brokerage account? If so, call Robert Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A. for a free consultation. Mr. Pearce is accepting clients with valid claims against State Farm VP Management Corp. stockbrokers who may have engaged in misconduct and caused investors losses.
The most important of investors' rights is the right to be informed! This Investors' Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A., located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over 30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law issues. The lawyers at our law firm are devoted to protecting investors' rights throughout the United States and internationally! Please visit our website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr. Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about this blog post and/or any related matter.