Many investors have purchased CIP
Leveraged Fund Advisors, LLC (“CLFA”) through an independent broker-dealer, Harvest
Capital LLC. CLFA was supposed to be a
manager of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), but failed miserably. Harvest Capital is one of the smaller independent
broker-dealers in the United States who offered and sold CLFA to its best
clients. Harvest Capital is headquartered
in Wethersfield, Connecticut and reportedly has over 70 registered
representatives across the United States operating in one or two person
offices.
Harvest Capital, like all
broker-dealers engaging in a Regulation D securities offering such as CLFA, was
responsible under the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) rules
to conduct “due diligence,” that is, conduct
a reasonable investigation of the CLFA securities offering and the issuer’s
representations about itself, the offering, its management, and business
prospects, including any targeted returns on the investment to investors and
determining the “suitability” of this investment for any and all of its
clients.
Independent Due Diligence of CLFA by Harvest Capital was Mandatory
Harvest Capital and other
broker-dealers could not simply rely upon an issuer of securities like CLFA,
the issuer’s attorneys or the lead broker-dealer Pacific Cornerstone Capital,
Inc. (“PCCI”) to conduct the investigation for it particularly where that lead
broker-dealer has a relationship with the issuer, which is an inherent
“conflict of interest.”
Under FINRA Rules, all
broker-dealers are responsible for discovering and investigating any
information that could be considered a “red flag” and alerting a prudent person
to conduct further inquiry. All broker-dealers
have a responsibility to conduct a reasonable investigation and are obligated
to follow up on any “red flags” that it encounters during its inquiry as well
as to investigate any substantial adverse information about the issuer and its
management. When presented with “red
flags,” the broker-dealer must do more than simply rely upon representations by
issuer’s management, the disclosure and an offering document or even a due
diligence report of issuer’s counsel or some third party expert.
It is reported that your CLFA
investment is now worthless. PCCI and it’s principal, Terry Roussel, were fined
and/or suspended by FINRA for making misleading statements to investors in
connection with the CLFA offering.
Thus far, two other
broker-dealers have been investigated and sanctioned by FINRA for violations
relating to their own failure to conduct due diligence on CLFA prior to
recommending it to their best clients, namely, Investors Capital Corp. and Workman
Securities Corporation. FINRA has reported that one or more of these
broker-dealers failed to conduct any reasonable due diligence investigation on
CLFA prior to selling CLFA securities.
Further, they did not seek independent third party due diligence
reports, meet with or ask questions of management about certain disclosures in
the PPM relating to projections and targets or even review unaudited CLFA
financial statements, which violated the rules.
It has also been reported that they reviewed third party reports that
did not include an analysis of how investors in CLFA would recover their
principal investment and whether the projected 18.75% yield was realistic.
All of this begs the question:
Did Harvest Capital perform an independent due diligence analysis before it
recommended the investment to its best clients? What analysis, if any, did Harvest
Capital perform of how investors would recover their principal investment and
whether the projected 18.75% yield was realistic? FINRA investigations are
confidential and although FINRA has not reportedly taken any action against Harvest
Capital to date, the failure of any broker-dealer to conduct those types of
inquiries could constitute a violation of FINRA rules and entitle you to
recovery of your investment losses from that brokerage firm.
Harvest Capital was Obligated to Perform a Suitability Analysis
Harvest Capital was also required
to have reasonable grounds to believe that a recommendation to purchase a
security is suitable for the customer.
This analysis has two principal components. First, the “reasonable basis”
suitability analysis requires the broker-dealer to have a reasonable basis to
believe, based on a reasonable investigation, that the recommendation is
suitable for at least some investors. If
there is no reasonable basis for any of the targeted returns, then the
securities offered are not suitable for any investor. Second, the “customer specific
suitability” analysis requires the broker-dealer to determine whether the
security is suitable for the customer to whom it would be recommended. This second suitability analysis is dependent
upon the investor’s stated investment objectives, risk tolerance and financial
condition. Any recommendation by a broker
that does not satisfactorily comply with either component can be a
violation of FINRA rules.
For most investors, liquidity,
income and risk tolerance are a concern, but if you are elderly and retired,
they are paramount! If you have limited
resources and no ability to generate income from other sources to meet your
liquidity and income needs then CLFA was an unsuitable investment. Likewise, if you cannot afford a total risk
of loss, then the speculative CLFA investment was unsuitable. The suitability problem is compounded when
any investors’ portfolio is concentrated in CLFA. A rule of thumb is that no
more than 10% of anyone’s investment portfolio should be concentrated in any
illiquid real estate investments, and that percentage should be far less as a
person reaches retirement and advances in age, perhaps zero!
Know Your Rights and Get Your Questions Answered!
The most important of investors’
rights is the right to be informed! This
Investors’ Rights blog post is by the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A.,
located in Boca Raton, Florida. For over
30 years, Attorney Pearce has tried, arbitrated, and mediated hundreds of
disputes involving complex securities, commodities and investment law
issues. The lawyers at our law firm are
devoted to protecting investors’ rights throughout the United States and
internationally! Please visit our
website, www.secatty.com, post a comment, call (800) 732-2889, or email Mr.
Pearce at pearce@rwpearce.com for answers to any of your questions about CLFA
and this blog post and/or any related matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment